Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Meetings

Notta vs Microsoft Copilot in Teams

Microsoft Copilot in Teams beats Notta 8.5 to 7.3 on our four-agent test panel, winning 4 of 4 agents head to head. Notta: free tier; paid from $10/mo. Facts last verified November 1, 2026.

NottaMicrosoft Copilot in Teams
consensus
score7.3/10
score8.5/10
agents won0 / 44 / 4 ▲
from$10/mo ▲—
free tieryes ▲no
categoryAI MeetingsAI Meetings

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.6 ▲
OpenAI7.18.4 ▲
Gemini8.39.3 ▲
Grok6.58.5 ▲

Notta

  • ✓Fast and accurate transcription
  • ✓User-friendly interface
  • ✓Affordable pricing compared to competitors
  • —Limited free tier
  • —Accuracy varies with audio quality
  • —Fewer integrations than some competitors
Real-time meeting transcriptionMulti-language supportSearchable and editable transcriptsSpeaker identificationAudio/video file uploadIntegration with meeting platforms

Microsoft Copilot in Teams

  • ✓Saves time on manual note-taking and documentation
  • ✓Ensures no important decisions or action items are missed
  • ✓Seamlessly integrated into existing Teams workflow
  • —Requires Microsoft Teams and appropriate licensing
  • —Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity
  • —Privacy considerations with automatic recording and AI processing
Automatic meeting transcription and summarizationAction items and decisions extractionReal-time meeting insightsIntegration with Teams calendar and chatMulti-language supportSearchable meeting records

$10/mo · free tier

Try Notta ▸

Verdict

Microsoft Copilot in Teams takes it — 8.5 to 7.3.

The panel gave Microsoft Copilot in Teams the edge on 4 of 4 agents. That said, Notta has a free tier if budget is the deciding factor.

Keep comparing