Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Meetings

Notta vs Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 beats Notta 8.5 to 7.3 on our four-agent test panel, winning 4 of 4 agents head to head. Notta: free tier; paid from $10/mo. Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365: from $30/mo. Facts last verified November 1, 2026.

NottaMicrosoft Copilot for Microsoft 365
consensus
score7.3/10
score8.5/10
agents won0 / 44 / 4 ▲
from$10/mo ▲$30/mo
free tieryes ▲no
categoryAI MeetingsAI Meetings

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.6 ▲
OpenAI7.18.6 ▲
Gemini8.39.5 ▲
Grok6.58.3 ▲

Notta

  • ✓Fast and accurate transcription
  • ✓User-friendly interface
  • ✓Affordable pricing compared to competitors
  • —Limited free tier
  • —Accuracy varies with audio quality
  • —Fewer integrations than some competitors
Real-time meeting transcriptionMulti-language supportSearchable and editable transcriptsSpeaker identificationAudio/video file uploadIntegration with meeting platforms

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365

  • ✓Saves time on manual note-taking and follow-ups
  • ✓Ensures consistent documentation of decisions and action items
  • ✓Seamless integration within Microsoft 365 ecosystem
  • —Requires Microsoft 365 enterprise subscription
  • —Privacy concerns with AI processing meeting data
  • —Accuracy depends on audio quality and meeting complexity
Automatic meeting transcription and summarizationAction item and decision extractionReal-time meeting notes generationIntegration with Teams, Outlook, and WordMulti-language supportChat-based Q&A about meeting content

Verdict

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 takes it — 8.5 to 7.3.

The panel gave Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 the edge on 4 of 4 agents. That said, Notta has a free tier if budget is the deciding factor.

Keep comparing