Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Meetings

Notta vs Copilot for Microsoft 365

Copilot for Microsoft 365 beats Notta 8.3 to 7.3 on our four-agent test panel, winning 4 of 4 agents head to head. Notta: free tier; paid from $10/mo. Copilot for Microsoft 365: from $20/mo. Facts last verified November 1, 2026.

NottaCopilot for Microsoft 365
consensus
score7.3/10
score8.3/10
agents won0 / 44 / 4 ▲
from$10/mo ▲$20/mo
free tieryes ▲no
categoryAI MeetingsAI Meetings

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.6 ▲
OpenAI7.18.2 ▲
Gemini8.39.2 ▲
Grok6.58.3 ▲

Notta

  • ✓Fast and accurate transcription
  • ✓User-friendly interface
  • ✓Affordable pricing compared to competitors
  • —Limited free tier
  • —Accuracy varies with audio quality
  • —Fewer integrations than some competitors
Real-time meeting transcriptionMulti-language supportSearchable and editable transcriptsSpeaker identificationAudio/video file uploadIntegration with meeting platforms

Copilot for Microsoft 365

  • ✓Saves significant time on manual note-taking
  • ✓Seamlessly integrates with existing Microsoft tools
  • ✓Improves meeting follow-up and accountability
  • —Requires Microsoft 365 subscription (additional cost)
  • —Privacy concerns with meeting recordings and AI processing
  • —Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity
Automatic meeting transcription and summarizationAction item and decision trackingIntegration with Teams, Outlook, and WordReal-time note generationSpeaker attributionMulti-language support

Verdict

Copilot for Microsoft 365 takes it — 8.3 to 7.3.

The panel gave Copilot for Microsoft 365 the edge on 4 of 4 agents. That said, Notta has a free tier if budget is the deciding factor.

Keep comparing