Bench test · AI Meetings
Happy Scribe vs Notta
Happy Scribe and Notta tie at 7.3/10 on our four-agent test panel. Notta: free tier; paid from $10/mo. Facts last verified November 1, 2026.
| Happy Scribe | Notta | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score7.3/10 | score7.3/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 ▲ | 1 / 4 |
| from | — | $10/mo ▲ |
| free tier | no | yes ▲ |
| category | AI Meetings | AI Meetings |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 7.4 ▲ | 7.1 |
| Gemini | 8.4 ▲ | 8.3 |
| Grok | 6.3 | 6.5 ▲ |
Happy Scribe
- ✓Fast and accurate AI transcription
- ✓User-friendly interface
- ✓Affordable pricing options
- —May struggle with heavy accents or poor audio quality
- —Requires manual editing for specialized terminology
- —Limited free tier functionality
Automatic audio/video to text transcriptionMulti-language supportSpeaker identification and diarizationTimestamp generationSubtitle and caption creationExport to multiple formats
Notta
- ✓Fast and accurate transcription
- ✓User-friendly interface
- ✓Affordable pricing compared to competitors
- —Limited free tier
- —Accuracy varies with audio quality
- —Fewer integrations than some competitors
Real-time meeting transcriptionMulti-language supportSearchable and editable transcriptsSpeaker identificationAudio/video file uploadIntegration with meeting platforms
Pricing on their site
Try Happy Scribe ▸$10/mo · free tier
Try Notta ▸Verdict
Dead heat — both land at 7.3. Pick on price and fit.