Bench test · AI Sales
Lattice Engines vs Intelligent.com (formerly Troops)
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Lattice Engines | Intelligent.com (formerly Troops) | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score4.8/10 | score4.9/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 1 / 4 |
| from | — | — |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Sales | AI Sales |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| OpenAI | 6.4 ▲ | 5.3 |
| Gemini | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Grok | 3.2 | 4.5 ▲ |
Lattice Engines
- ✓Improves sales efficiency by focusing on high-probability deals
- ✓Combines intent data with predictive modeling for accuracy
- —Requires quality data inputs for optimal performance
- —Higher cost may limit accessibility for smaller teams
Predictive lead and account scoringAccount-based marketing orchestrationBuyer intent signals detectionFirmographic and behavioral data analysisCRM integrationSales and marketing alignment tools
Intelligent.com (formerly Troops)
- ✓Reduces manual CRM data entry
- ✓Provides actionable insights for deal progression
- ✓Seamless Salesforce integration
- —Requires Salesforce subscription for full functionality
- —Learning curve for optimal AI usage
- —Dependent on data quality in Salesforce
Salesforce workflow automationReal-time sales insights and analyticsConversational AI assistantAutomated CRM data updatesDeal intelligence and recommendationsSales forecasting
Pricing on their site
Try Lattice Engines ▸Pricing on their site
Try Intelligent.com (formerly Troops) ▸Verdict
Intelligent.com (formerly Troops) takes it — 4.9 to 4.8 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Intelligent.com (formerly Troops) the edge on 1 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Lattice Engines is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.