Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Meetings

Fireflies.ai vs Copilot for Microsoft 365

Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.

Fireflies.aiCopilot for Microsoft 365
consensus
score8.7/10
score8.5/10
agents won2 / 41 / 4
fromCustomCustom
free tiernono
categoryAI MeetingsAI Meetings

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic8.27.8
OpenAI8.58.5
Gemini8.99.2
Grok9.08.5

Fireflies.ai

  • Saves significant time on manual note-taking
  • Accurate transcriptions with speaker labels
  • Easy integration with popular platforms
  • Privacy concerns with automatic recording
  • May struggle with heavy accents or background noise
  • Pricing increases with team size
Automatic meeting recording and transcriptionAI-generated summaries and action itemsFull-text searchable transcriptsMulti-language supportSpeaker identificationIntegration with Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, Slack

Copilot for Microsoft 365

  • Saves significant time on manual note-taking
  • Seamlessly integrates with existing Microsoft tools
  • Improves meeting follow-up and accountability
  • Requires Microsoft 365 subscription (additional cost)
  • Privacy concerns with meeting recordings and AI processing
  • Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity
Automatic meeting transcription and summarizationAction item and decision trackingIntegration with Teams, Outlook, and WordReal-time note generationSpeaker attributionMulti-language support

Custom · no free tier

Try Fireflies.ai

Custom · no free tier

Try Copilot for Microsoft 365

Verdict

Fireflies.ai takes it — 8.7 to 8.5 (a photo finish).

The panel gave Fireflies.ai the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Copilot for Microsoft 365 is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.