Bench test · ai-design
Sketch vs Screens
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Sketch | Screens | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score6.9/10 | score7.3/10 |
| agents won | 3 / 4 ▲ | 1 / 4 |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | ai-design | ai-design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 8.2 ▲ | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 8.5 ▲ | 7.5 |
| Gemini | 8.8 ▲ | 8.0 |
| Grok | 2.0 | 6.5 ▲ |
Sketch
- ✓Intuitive interface optimized for UI/UX design
- ✓Strong design system and component management
- ✓Extensive plugin library and integrations
- —macOS-only application (no native Windows support)
- —Subscription-based pricing model
- —Steep learning curve for beginners
Vector-based design toolsCollaborative design workspaceComponent libraries and reusable symbolsPrototyping capabilitiesDeveloper handoff and specsPlugin ecosystem for extensibility
Screens
- ✓Accelerates design workflow with AI assistance
- ✓Supports both mobile and web projects
- ✓Exports production-ready code
- —Learning curve for new users
- —Limited customization in some AI suggestions
- —Subscription-based pricing model
AI-powered design suggestionsMobile and web interface creationAutomated layout generationComponent library integrationReal-time collaborationDesign-to-code export
Custom · no free tier
Try Sketch ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Screens ▸Verdict
Screens takes it — 7.3 to 6.9.
The panel gave Screens the edge on 1 of 4 agents.