Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI SEO

SEOquake vs Outbrain

Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.

SEOquakeOutbrain
consensus
score6.6/10
score6.7/10
agents won1 / 41 / 4
fromCustomCustom
free tiernono
categoryAI SEOAI SEO

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.2
OpenAI8.57.5
Gemini7.08.5
Grok3.53.5

SEOquake

  • Quick, real-time insights without leaving your browser
  • Affordable access to competitive SEO data
  • User-friendly interface for beginners and professionals
  • Limited depth compared to enterprise SEO tools
  • Free version has restricted features and data limits
  • Occasional accuracy variations in metrics
Instant SEO metrics and on-page analysisCompetitor comparison and benchmarkingKeyword difficulty and search volume dataBacklink analysis and domain authority checkingSERP analysis and rankings trackingCustomizable reports and exports

Outbrain

  • Drives significant referral traffic to content
  • Improves user engagement and time-on-site
  • Monetization opportunities for publishers
  • Can appear as clickbait if poorly configured
  • Requires quality content to be effective
  • Dependent on third-party distribution network
AI-powered content recommendationsMulti-channel distribution networkSEO-optimized suggestion widgetsReal-time performance analyticsNative advertising capabilitiesAudience targeting and segmentation

Custom · no free tier

Try SEOquake

Custom · no free tier

Try Outbrain

Verdict

Outbrain takes it — 6.7 to 6.6 (a photo finish).

The panel gave Outbrain the edge on 1 of 4 agents. It's close enough that SEOquake is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.