Bench test · AI Search
SearXNG vs Lex.page
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| SearXNG | Lex.page | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score7.1/10 | score7.5/10 |
| agents won | 3 / 4 ▲ | 1 / 4 |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Search | AI Search |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 8.2 ▲ | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 8.5 ▲ | 7.8 |
| Gemini | 8.2 ▲ | 8.0 |
| Grok | 3.5 | 6.8 ▲ |
SearXNG
- ✓Strong privacy protection with no user profiling
- ✓Transparent, auditable open-source codebase
- ✓Less dependent on any single search provider
- —Slower results due to multiple backend queries
- —Less personalized than commercial search engines
- —Smaller user base means fewer community resources
Aggregates results from 70+ search enginesNo tracking or data retentionCustomizable search filters and preferencesSelf-hostable open-source codeAnonymous query forwardingMultiple language and region support
Lex.page
- ✓Combines writing and research in one tool
- ✓Minimalist, distraction-free design
- ✓Fast AI-powered content suggestions
- —Limited offline functionality
- —Requires internet connection for search features
- —Smaller feature set compared to comprehensive suites
AI-assisted writing and editingIntegrated web search functionalityReal-time research capabilitiesMarkdown supportDistraction-free writing interfaceContent generation assistance
Custom · no free tier
Try SearXNG ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Lex.page ▸Verdict
Lex.page takes it — 7.5 to 7.1.
The panel gave Lex.page the edge on 1 of 4 agents.