Bench test · AI Search
Searx.me vs Neeva
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Searx.me | Neeva | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score5.2/10 | score5.8/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 2 / 4 ▲ |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Search | AI Search |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 7.5 | 8.5 ▲ |
| Gemini | 4.0 ▲ | 0.0 |
| Grok | 2.0 | 7.5 ▲ |
Searx.me
- ✓Strong privacy protection with no data collection
- ✓Comprehensive results from diverse sources
- ✓Transparent, auditable open-source code
- —Slower response times due to aggregation
- —Less refined results than specialized engines
- —Occasional downtime and reliability issues
Aggregates results from 70+ search enginesNo tracking or cookies by defaultCustomizable search parameters and enginesAnonymous query forwardingOpen-source and self-hostableMultiple language and region support
Neeva
- ✓Strong privacy protection
- ✓Clean, uncluttered results
- ✓No behavioral tracking
- —Requires paid subscription
- —Smaller index than Google
- —Limited market adoption
Ad-free search resultsNo user tracking or data sellingAI-powered answer generationSubscription-based modelPrivacy-first approachPersonalized search without profiling
Custom · no free tier
Try Searx.me ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Neeva ▸Verdict
Neeva takes it — 5.8 to 5.2.
The panel gave Neeva the edge on 2 of 4 agents.