Bench test · AI SEO
Screamingfrog SEO Spider vs Writerly
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Screamingfrog SEO Spider | Writerly | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score5.7/10 | score5.7/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| from | Free | — |
| free tier | yes ▲ | no |
| category | AI SEO | AI SEO |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.6 ▲ | 6.2 |
| OpenAI | 8.6 ▲ | 5.6 |
| Gemini | 3.5 | 6.5 ▲ |
| Grok | 3.2 | 4.5 ▲ |
Screamingfrog SEO Spider
- ✓Comprehensive technical SEO analysis in one tool
- ✓User-friendly interface with detailed reporting
- ✓Free version available with core features
- —Limited crawl depth in free version
- —Steep learning curve for advanced features
- —Can be resource-intensive for large websites
Website crawling and technical SEO auditsXML sitemap generationDuplicate content detectionBroken link identificationMeta tag analysisStructured data validation
Writerly
- ✓Speeds up content production with AI assistance
- ✓Built-in SEO focus improves search rankings
- ✓Team collaboration streamlines workflows
- —AI-generated content may need human review for quality
- —Limited customization for niche industry requirements
AI-powered content generationSEO optimization and keyword integrationTeam collaboration toolsContent editing and refinementMulti-format content creation
Free · free tier
Try Screamingfrog SEO Spider ▸Pricing on their site
Try Writerly ▸Verdict
Dead heat — both land at 5.7. Pick on price and fit.