Bench test · AI Automation
Relay vs ActivePieces
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Relay | ActivePieces | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score7.9/10 | score8.0/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 2 / 4 ▲ |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Automation | AI Automation |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.8 ▲ |
| OpenAI | 8.2 | 8.5 ▲ |
| Gemini | 8.5 ▲ | 8.0 |
| Grok | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Relay
- ✓Balances automation with human control
- ✓User-friendly interface for non-technical users
- ✓Flexible integration across platforms
- —Limited AI customization for advanced use cases
- —Smaller ecosystem compared to major competitors
- —Pricing scales with workflow complexity
AI-powered workflow automationHuman-in-the-loop approval stepsMulti-app integrationNo-code workflow builderConditional logic and branchingCustom AI actions
ActivePieces
- ✓Fully open-source with no vendor lock-in
- ✓Lower cost than enterprise alternatives like Zapier
- ✓Easy-to-use visual interface for non-technical users
- —Smaller ecosystem and fewer pre-built integrations than competitors
- —Requires more technical setup for self-hosting
- —Less mature documentation compared to established platforms
Visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop interfacePre-built connectors for 100+ popular applicationsSelf-hosted and cloud deployment optionsCustom code support for advanced automationsWebhook and API integration capabilitiesCommunity-driven development and extensions
Custom · no free tier
Try Relay ▸Custom · no free tier
Try ActivePieces ▸Verdict
ActivePieces takes it — 8 to 7.9 (a photo finish).
The panel gave ActivePieces the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Relay is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.