Bench test · AI Design
Penpot vs Construct
Construct beats Penpot 5.9 to 5.0 on our four-agent test panel, winning 2 of 4 agents head to head. Penpot: free tier available. Construct: free tier available. Facts last verified October 7, 2026.
| Penpot | Construct | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score5.0/10 | score5.9/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 2 / 4 ▲ |
| from | Free | Free |
| free tier | yes | yes |
| category | AI Design | AI Design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 7.1 ▲ | 5.4 |
| Gemini | 3.5 | 5.5 ▲ |
| Grok | 2.0 | 5.3 ▲ |
Penpot
- ✓Free and open-source with no licensing costs
- ✓Strong collaborative features for team workflows
- ✓Can be self-hosted for data privacy
- —Smaller user community and fewer third-party integrations than competitors
- —Performance may lag with very large design files
- —Steeper learning curve for users familiar with proprietary tools
Real-time collaborative designVector editing and prototypingDesign system libraries and componentsInteractive prototypes and animationsMulti-platform accessibility via web browserOpen-source codebase
Construct
- ✓Accelerates game development workflow
- ✓Reduces need for manual asset creation
- ✓Accessible to non-professional developers
- —Generated assets may require refinement
- —Learning curve for complex features
- —Limited customization for AI-generated content
AI-powered asset generationIntelligent level design assistanceVisual game editorMulti-platform exportBuilt-in physics engineAsset library integration
Free · free tier
Try Penpot ▸Free · free tier
Try Construct ▸Verdict
Construct takes it — 5.9 to 5.
The panel gave Construct the edge on 2 of 4 agents.