Bench test · AI Automation
Make vs Microsoft 365 Copilot
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Make | Microsoft 365 Copilot | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score8.6/10 | score8.6/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 2 / 4 ▲ |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Automation | AI Automation |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 8.2 ▲ | 7.8 |
| OpenAI | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Gemini | 9.2 | 9.5 ▲ |
| Grok | 8.3 | 8.5 ▲ |
Make
- ✓No coding required; accessible to non-technical users
- ✓Powerful AI capabilities reduce manual work
- ✓Large library of app integrations
- —Steep learning curve for complex workflows
- —Pricing scales quickly with usage and scenarios
- —Limited AI customization compared to dedicated AI platforms
Visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop interfaceAI-powered automation steps for intelligent task handlingMulti-app integration and data mappingConditional logic and branching workflowsPre-built templates and scenariosReal-time monitoring and error handling
Microsoft 365 Copilot
- ✓Seamless integration with existing Microsoft 365 tools
- ✓Reduces time on repetitive tasks like writing and formatting
- ✓Improves productivity across multiple applications
- —Requires premium Microsoft 365 subscription and separate licensing
- —Limited customization for enterprise-specific workflows
- —Potential data privacy concerns with cloud-based processing
Natural language prompts for document drafting and editingData analysis and visualization in ExcelAutomated meeting summaries and insightsEmail composition and scheduling assistancePresentation creation and design suggestionsCross-application context awareness
Custom · no free tier
Try Make ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Microsoft 365 Copilot ▸Verdict
Dead heat — both land at 8.6. Pick on price and fit.