Bench test · AI Design
Looka vs Durable
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Looka | Durable | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score7.3/10 | score7.4/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| from | Free | Free |
| free tier | yes | yes |
| category | AI Design | AI Design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.8 ▲ | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 7.0 ▲ | 6.7 |
| Gemini | 7.1 | 8.3 ▲ |
| Grok | 7.2 | 7.3 ▲ |
Looka
- ✓Fast and affordable alternative to hiring designers
- ✓User-friendly interface requiring no design experience
- ✓Generates multiple creative variations quickly
- —Quality varies and may lack uniqueness
- —Limited customization compared to professional designers
- —Premium features require paid subscription
AI-generated logo designs from text promptsCustomizable color palettes and design stylesBrand identity package generation (logos, fonts, colors)Design variation exploration and refinementHigh-resolution downloadable filesTrademark search integration
Durable
- ✓Fast setup with minimal technical skills required
- ✓Affordable alternative to hiring designers/developers
- ✓AI handles copywriting and design suggestions
- —Limited customization compared to traditional website builders
- —AI-generated content may require editing for brand voice
- —Smaller feature set than established platforms like Wix or Squarespace
AI website builder with drag-and-drop interfaceAutomated business content generationPre-built templates for various industriesMobile-responsive designBuilt-in SEO optimizationE-commerce and payment integration
Free · free tier
Try Looka ▸Free · free tier
Try Durable ▸Verdict
Durable takes it — 7.4 to 7.3 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Durable the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Looka is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.