Bench test · AI Coding
LLaMA Code vs Devin
LLaMA Code beats Devin 6.6 to 6.4 on our four-agent test panel, winning 2 of 4 agents head to head. LLaMA Code: free tier available. Facts last verified October 7, 2026.
| LLaMA Code | Devin | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score6.6/10 | score6.4/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| from | Free | — |
| free tier | yes ▲ | no |
| category | AI Coding | AI Coding |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.8 ▲ |
| OpenAI | 6.7 | 7.1 ▲ |
| Gemini | 6.8 ▲ | 6.3 |
| Grok | 5.5 ▲ | 4.5 |
LLaMA Code
- ✓No licensing fees or usage costs
- ✓Can be self-hosted and modified
- ✓Respects privacy with local deployment
- —Requires significant computational resources
- —May produce less accurate results than proprietary models
- —Needs technical expertise to set up and optimize
Multi-language code generationCode completion and suggestionsOpen-source and freely availableCustomizable and fine-tunableRuns locally without cloud dependencyContext-aware programming assistance
Devin
- ✓Significantly accelerates development cycles
- ✓Reduces manual coding time and human errors
- ✓Handles repetitive and boilerplate code generation
- —May struggle with highly complex or novel problem domains
- —Requires oversight to ensure code quality and security
- —Limited understanding of specific business logic nuances
Autonomous code writing and executionReal-time debugging and error fixingProject planning and task breakdownIntegration with development tools and repositoriesCollaborative pair programming with humansApplication deployment capabilities
Free · free tier
Try LLaMA Code ▸Pricing on their site
Try Devin ▸Verdict
LLaMA Code takes it — 6.6 to 6.4 (a photo finish).
The panel gave LLaMA Code the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Devin is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.