Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI SEO

Keywords Everywhere vs Writerly

Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.

Keywords EverywhereWriterly
consensus
score7.6/10
score7.5/10
agents won1 / 42 / 4
fromCustomCustom
free tiernono
categoryAI SEOAI SEO

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.2
OpenAI7.57.8
Gemini9.08.0
Grok6.57.0

Keywords Everywhere

  • Saves time with instant data without switching tabs
  • Affordable pricing with free tier available
  • Reduces reliance on expensive SEO tools for basic research
  • Limited data depth compared to dedicated SEO platforms
  • Accuracy depends on extension's data sources
  • Requires browser extension installation and maintenance
Inline keyword volume and CPC data on Google SearchSearch intent classification (Commercial, Informational, etc.)Keyword difficulty scoresRelated keywords and long-tail suggestionsIntegration with Google Search Console dataCompetitor analysis across SERPs

Writerly

  • Speeds up content production with AI assistance
  • Built-in SEO focus improves search rankings
  • Team collaboration streamlines workflows
  • AI-generated content may need human review for quality
  • Limited customization for niche industry requirements
AI-powered content generationSEO optimization and keyword integrationTeam collaboration toolsContent editing and refinementMulti-format content creation

Custom · no free tier

Try Keywords Everywhere

Custom · no free tier

Try Writerly

Verdict

Keywords Everywhere takes it — 7.6 to 7.5 (a photo finish).

The panel gave Keywords Everywhere the edge on 1 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Writerly is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.