Bench test · AI Automation
Integromat vs Lindy
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Integromat | Lindy | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score8.1/10 | score8.2/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 ▲ | 1 / 4 |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Automation | AI Automation |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 8.2 ▲ | 7.8 |
| OpenAI | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Gemini | 9.3 ▲ | 8.9 |
| Grok | 6.5 | 7.5 ▲ |
Integromat
- ✓User-friendly visual interface requires no coding
- ✓Extensive app library with thousands of integrations
- ✓Cost-effective compared to custom development
- —Complex workflows can become difficult to manage
- —Learning curve for advanced features
- —Pricing scales with usage and complexity
Visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop interfacePre-built connectors for 1000+ applicationsReal-time data sync between connected appsConditional logic and branching workflowsError handling and retry mechanismsScheduling and trigger-based automation
Lindy
- ✓Easy to use without programming knowledge
- ✓Reduces manual repetitive work significantly
- ✓Flexible integration with existing tools
- —Limited documentation for complex workflows
- —May require setup assistance for enterprise use
- —Pricing scales with automation volume
No-code AI agent builderMulti-app integration and API connectionsAutonomous task execution and schedulingNatural language workflow configurationData processing and automationCustom trigger and action workflows
Custom · no free tier
Try Integromat ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Lindy ▸Verdict
Lindy takes it — 8.2 to 8.1 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Lindy the edge on 1 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Integromat is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.