Bench test · AI Design
Figma vs Adobe Generative Fill
Figma beats Adobe Generative Fill 9.1 to 9.0 on our four-agent test panel, winning 1 of 4 agents head to head. Figma: free tier; paid from $12/mo. Adobe Generative Fill: from $10/mo. Facts last verified November 1, 2026.
| Figma | Adobe Generative Fill | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score9.1/10 | score9.0/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 1 / 4 |
| from | $12/mo | $10/mo ▲ |
| free tier | yes ▲ | no |
| category | AI Design | AI Design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 9.2 ▲ | 8.2 |
| OpenAI | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Gemini | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Grok | 8.7 | 9.5 ▲ |
Figma
- ✓Browser-based, no installation required
- ✓Seamless team collaboration and commenting
- ✓Strong prototyping capabilities
- —Performance lags with very large files
- —Steeper learning curve for beginners
- —Subscription costs for advanced features
Real-time collaborative editingInteractive prototyping and animationsDesign systems and component librariesDeveloper handoff with code inspectionMulti-file version historyPlugins and integrations ecosystem
Adobe Generative Fill
- ✓Saves significant editing time for complex tasks
- ✓Produces realistic, high-quality results
- ✓Intuitive interface integrated into Photoshop workflow
- —Requires Adobe Creative Cloud subscription
- —Generative credits system limits free usage
- —Results may require manual refinement for perfect output
Generative fill for selections using text promptsGenerative expand to extend canvas and backgroundsObject removal and inpaintingMultiple variation generationSeamless content blendingIntegration with Photoshop's selection tools
$12/mo · free tier
Try Figma ▸Verdict
Figma takes it — 9.1 to 9 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Figma the edge on 1 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Adobe Generative Fill is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.