Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Meetings

Copilot for Microsoft 365 vs Fireflies Meeting Assistant

Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.

Copilot for Microsoft 365Fireflies Meeting Assistant
consensus
score8.7/10
score8.6/10
agents won2 / 40 / 4
fromCustomCustom
free tiernono
categoryAI MeetingsAI Meetings

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic8.28.2
OpenAI8.78.5
Gemini9.39.2
Grok8.58.5

Copilot for Microsoft 365

  • Saves significant time on manual note-taking
  • Seamlessly integrates with existing Microsoft tools
  • Improves meeting follow-up and accountability
  • Requires Microsoft 365 subscription (additional cost)
  • Privacy concerns with meeting recordings and AI processing
  • Accuracy depends on audio quality and speaker clarity
Automatic meeting transcription and summarizationAction item and decision trackingIntegration with Teams, Outlook, and WordReal-time note generationSpeaker attributionMulti-language support

Fireflies Meeting Assistant

  • Saves time on manual note-taking and meeting prep
  • Works across major meeting platforms seamlessly
  • Accurate transcription with speaker identification
  • Privacy concerns with automatic recording
  • May miss context or nuance in complex discussions
  • Requires subscription for full features
Real-time meeting recording and transcriptionAI-generated action items and summariesMulti-platform integration (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, etc.)Searchable meeting library and archivesSpeaker identification and timestampsAutomated note-taking and follow-up tracking

Verdict

Copilot for Microsoft 365 takes it — 8.7 to 8.6 (a photo finish).

The panel gave Copilot for Microsoft 365 the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Fireflies Meeting Assistant is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.