Bench test · AI Design
AutoDraw vs Screens
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| AutoDraw | Screens | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score3.6/10 | score5.3/10 |
| agents won | 1 / 4 | 3 / 4 ▲ |
| from | Free | — |
| free tier | yes ▲ | no |
| category | AI Design | AI Design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 3.5 | 6.2 ▲ |
| OpenAI | 3.2 | 6.1 ▲ |
| Gemini | 5.0 | 6.5 ▲ |
| Grok | 2.8 ▲ | 2.5 |
AutoDraw
- ✓Completely free with no account required
- ✓Intuitive and beginner-friendly interface
- ✓Fast, responsive AI suggestions
- —Limited to simple drawings and basic shapes
- —No advanced design tools or layers
- —Export options are basic (PNG only)
AI sketch recognition and auto-correctionReal-time drawing suggestionsVector art conversionShape and object detectionQuick color customizationExport to PNG
Screens
- ✓Accelerates design workflow with AI assistance
- ✓Supports both mobile and web projects
- ✓Exports production-ready code
- —Learning curve for new users
- —Limited customization in some AI suggestions
- —Subscription-based pricing model
AI-powered design suggestionsMobile and web interface creationAutomated layout generationComponent library integrationReal-time collaborationDesign-to-code export
Free · free tier
Try AutoDraw ▸Pricing on their site
Try Screens ▸Verdict
Screens takes it — 5.3 to 3.6.
The panel gave Screens the edge on 3 of 4 agents. That said, AutoDraw has a free tier if budget is the deciding factor.