Bench test · AI Search
Arc Search vs Komo Search
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Arc Search | Komo Search | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score7.9/10 | score7.8/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 ▲ | 0 / 4 |
| from | Custom | Custom |
| free tier | no | no |
| category | AI Search | AI Search |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 8.5 ▲ | 8.3 |
| Gemini | 8.4 ▲ | 8.0 |
| Grok | 7.5 | 7.5 |
Arc Search
- ✓Faster answers without browsing multiple sites
- ✓Seamless browser experience
- —Limited source transparency in summaries
- —Potential accuracy issues from AI synthesis
Multi-source information aggregationAI-powered answer synthesisNative browser integrationReal-time web data processingReduced search result clutter
Komo Search
- ✓Strong privacy protection with zero tracking
- ✓Fast, AI-enhanced search results
- ✓No ads or behavioral targeting
- —Smaller search index than major competitors
- —Limited market adoption and awareness
- —Fewer specialized features than Google
No user tracking or data collectionAI-powered answer generationReal-time web search integrationAnonymous search sessionsAd-free interfaceGDPR compliant
Custom · no free tier
Try Arc Search ▸Custom · no free tier
Try Komo Search ▸Verdict
Arc Search takes it — 7.9 to 7.8 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Arc Search the edge on 2 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Komo Search is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.