Independently agent-testedAnthropic · OpenAI · Gemini · Grok
Try Tested®

Bench test · AI Search

Arc Search vs DeepSeek

Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.

Arc SearchDeepSeek
consensus
score7.0/10
score7.1/10
agents won1 / 43 / 4 ▲
fromFreeFree
free tieryesyes
categoryAI SearchAI Search

Agent panel — head to head

Anthropic7.27.8 ▲
OpenAI7.28.0 ▲
Gemini8.0 ▲6.2
Grok5.56.5 ▲

Arc Search

  • ✓Faster answers without browsing multiple sites
  • ✓Seamless browser experience
  • —Limited source transparency in summaries
  • —Potential accuracy issues from AI synthesis
Multi-source information aggregationAI-powered answer synthesisNative browser integrationReal-time web data processingReduced search result clutter

DeepSeek

  • ✓Combines search with reasoning for comprehensive answers
  • ✓Provides source citations for transparency
  • ✓Strong performance on complex reasoning tasks
  • —Limited market presence compared to competitors
  • —Potential accuracy concerns in specialized domains
  • —Less established track record than mainstream alternatives
Real-time web search integrationAdvanced reasoning and logic processingMulti-turn conversational dialogueSource citation and attributionComplex problem-solving capabilitiesNatural language understanding

Free · free tier

Try Arc Search ▸

Free · free tier

Try DeepSeek ▸

Verdict

DeepSeek takes it — 7.1 to 7 (a photo finish).

The panel gave DeepSeek the edge on 3 of 4 agents. It's close enough that Arc Search is a fair pick if it fits your workflow better.