Bench test · AI Design
Affinity Designer vs Construct
Same rack, same rubric, four independent agents. Here's how they measure up — and which we'd pick.
| Affinity Designer | Construct | |
|---|---|---|
| consensus | score6.2/10 | score5.9/10 |
| agents won | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| from | — | Free |
| free tier | no | yes ▲ |
| category | AI Design | AI Design |
Agent panel — head to head
| Anthropic | 7.6 ▲ | 7.2 |
| OpenAI | 7.8 ▲ | 5.4 |
| Gemini | 5.0 | 5.5 ▲ |
| Grok | 4.3 | 5.3 ▲ |
Affinity Designer
- ✓One-time purchase with no subscription required
- ✓Seamless integration of vector and raster workflows
- ✓Professional-grade tools at competitive pricing
- —Steeper learning curve for beginners
- —Smaller plugin ecosystem compared to Adobe products
- —Limited cloud storage and online features
Vector and raster design in one workspaceNon-destructive effects and adjustmentsAdvanced typography and text toolsExtensive brush library and customizationReal-time collaboration capabilitiesSupport for multiple artboards and layers
Construct
- ✓Accelerates game development workflow
- ✓Reduces need for manual asset creation
- ✓Accessible to non-professional developers
- —Generated assets may require refinement
- —Learning curve for complex features
- —Limited customization for AI-generated content
AI-powered asset generationIntelligent level design assistanceVisual game editorMulti-platform exportBuilt-in physics engineAsset library integration
Pricing on their site
Try Affinity Designer ▸Free · free tier
Try Construct ▸Verdict
Affinity Designer takes it — 6.2 to 5.9 (a photo finish).
The panel gave Affinity Designer the edge on 2 of 4 agents. That said, Construct has a free tier if budget is the deciding factor.